
(a valentine’s day present from my grandmother.)
so, at this point in the game, most of you know that buttons for north caroline, my debut album, is a full-length narrative. and although there are things like floods and car crashes and serial killers and amnesia that flows through the record, it’s essentially an album about two people (mr. sailor and north caroline) that fall in love. i always joke with people that i made buttons for north caroline a record full of love songs, just in case i wouldn’t be able to get away with doing so later on.
a lot of the time, i get e-mails from artists and fans from the artier end of the spectrum, the ones that love the fact that i blend folk-pop with ambient flourishes and woozy string quartets and digital noise and guitars that sound like buses, and they ask me why i take such an experimental stance on my music, and then mess it all up by writing about love songs. and my reply is, “i don’t think i got the worldwide memo when writing love songs became uncool.”
it’s argued that, with everything going on in the world, and with all the things that could be written about, why write ANOTHER song about that well-worn feeling, regardless of how unavoidable it is? where are our protest songs? why doesn’t someone write a concept album about super mario bros.? oh, wait, the whole point of that video game is to save a girl, right? oops.
my theory about protest songs is as follows: the only reason all of those songs written during the reagan era are relavent today is because the unthinkable happened and we were given a president that’s actually even worse. during the clinton era (and hopefully, if obama is elected), these songs abour reagan sounded cool, but the subject matter was extremely dated.
i mean, of course you’re always going to have the mainstream artists that make the genre of writing love songs played out, but even in the mainstream, you’ll sometimes come across a band or two that tweak the format a little and deliver endlessly playable albums to soundtrack your relationships’ ups and downs (see also: death cab for cutie, the shins).
and in the music underground, there are plenty of artists doing new things with the old “love song” format. take sleeping states, for instance. markland starkie created an album, there the open spaces, which was a record full of pretty straightforward, confessional love songs, only he turned the template on its head by arranging his guitars the way a classical composer arranges string quartets. the dodos take practically the same subject matter, only replacing a masterful guitar arranger with a delta blues guitarist and a heavy metal drummer (shoutout to ear farm). vivian girls, the album i just wrote about yesterday (and an “albums of the year list shoe-in”), was a record full of loud, raucous songs about love. in addition to having substance-filled songs about race (”the wrong way”) and war (”bomb yourself”), tv on the radio’s desperate youth, bloodthirsty babes had songs like “ambulance” and “poppy.” and this is only scratching the surface: debut albums from interpol, grizzly bear, and damn near every female singer/songwriter in existence are all about that same thing.
i suppose that i shouldn’t take it so personally and not write an extended rant on such a public forum, but i just feel as though love songs have a place in all forms of music, no matter how pedestrian or idiosyncratic it is. some music is just more fun when it’s soundtracking a crush or a make-out session, or that time that bastard broke your heart and you invited ben and jerry over every night for two straight weeks for pints and re-runs of friends. love is one of those things that will never go away, so why not embrace the songs that detail it?
MP3: fresh cherries from yakima- true love will find you in the end (daniel johnston cover).